Apologies for the lazy cross-posting. I have been revising my netnography book for Sage–aggh. An author’s life can leave little time for writing, or blogging.
It did leave me a little bit of time to have an interesting and wide-ranging conversation with Francois Gossieaux on Tuesday. We had a chance to talk a bit about academic research and business research, and then got into some nitty gritty topics about managing communities. I’m very impressed with the work that Francois and Lois Kelly are doing, and I think you might be too.
I’m reposting this just-posted blog entry summarizing the conversation we had.
Take a look at the other interesting CMO 2.0 material and links. There’s a lot of high-quality thinking on this site. I hope to continue to talk and learn from Francois, Kelly, and the rest of the Beeline gurus.
Here’s the repost…..
Written by Francois Gossieaux on May 7, 2009 9:01 pm –
For my first CMO 2.0 Influencer Conversation, I spoke with Rob Kozinets, a professor of marketing from York University in Toronto, about communities, consumer tribes and word of mouth marketing not surprising considering that Rob was the editor of Consumer Tribes, a collection of research papers on consumer tribes, recently finished a book on word of mouth, and is one of the few researchers looking at the practice of business through the eyes of an anthropologist/ethnographer (among other things).
We started the conversation by talking about the disconnect between the world of academics and the world of business, especially as it relates to marketing. It is an unfortunate fact that many mistakes could be avoided if marketers were making informed decisions based in part on some of the recent findings in the fields of behavioral economics, anthropology, complexity theory, sociology, and psychology.
One of Robs main themes is that consumer learning, opinions and transmission of influence happens in smaller groups – hence the idea of tribes. Todays tribes have looser affiliations and are more hedonistic in nature than ancient tribes. They are nomadic by interest, rather than geography, and centered around expertise and commercial culture. Consumer Tribes are also not typically focused on a single brand but rather on a whole group, a whole culture or lifestyle, or a set of activities. Another challenge for marketers, according to Kozinets, is that consumer tribes dont typically develop long-lasting relationships. Even some of the stronger tribes, like the Star Trek groups that were so popular in the 90s, arent as active anymore – people move on as they get more options. It would actually be interesting to see if the Harley community is still as strong as it used to be. People move in and out of consumer tribes, and the tribes seem to have a natural life and death cycle – including a revival stage sometimes.
Of course, most marketers dont think of their customers as tribes yet, or dont realize the enormous impact that successful customer communities can have, so for many of them this is an non-existent problem.
According to Rob, one of the big problems with communities is that companies are setting them us expecting fixed ROI. In reality the measurement of the the impact of communities is very hard. They are hard to set up, take time to take off, and are challenging to maintain. And, as Rob points out, a lot of the successful community marketers have had their communities formed for them by their customers – much like Harley.
We also talked about the proliferation of special interest communities sponsored by various companies – e.g., small business focused communities, of which there are dozens. Obviously members will not want to belong to multiple small business communities, so what then? Consolidation, with most members gravitating towards the most successful small business community, or further fragmentation, with more user-driven communities aggregating around micro objectives? Its hard to predict where we will see consolidation vs. fragmentation of communities as we do not quite understand how people move in and out of those spaces.
An interesting concept which Rob brought up was share of community time, which, in a way, is a measurement related to John Hagels Return on Attention (John has also agreed to conduct a CMO 2.0 Influencer conversation with me – stay tuned for a date). The problem with calculating share of community time is that there is a huge spread in the estimated number of people who participate in communities – between 100M and 1b.
Other things we talked about include:
- The role of payments and incentives in communities
- Whether online focus groups are stretching the possibilities of online community environments
- How to engage with your detractors as well as your champions
- How, if you are going to open things up, you should have a strategy to deal with criticism that will come
- The pros and cons of having a neat classification system for communities based on the different needs that they are trying to solve
- How community organizers need to think about members first and brand second
We also touched on word of mouth and how most marketers expect word of mouth to amplify their message, when in reality most word of mouth will transform your message.
As usual, you can listen to the podcast below, and we will be releasing transcripts soon.