People-Centered Marketing: An Introduction

people_kozinets.gifThe latest phase of my career is taking an interesting new direction. I am trying to get a more holistic look at “marketing” as a discipline and a practice, and analyze how all the elements of “marketing”, such as marketing research and brand management, fit together with management as a field. I’ve been thinking about this for over a year, and last year wrote an editorial for Canada’s national business newspaper, The National Post, on the topic. I originally titled it rather dramatically as “The End of Marketing” but they published it more positively as “Marketing’s Evolution.” Here is the original article, if you are interested.

Talking with the brilliant and insightful marketing researcher, consultant, professor, and author Shira Nayman about some mutual interests about six weeks ago, I was struggling with a term for what I was trying to say. “Consumer-centered marketing” was clumsy, but it was all I had. Wordsmith that she is, she suggested the term “People-Centered Marketing” and it really fit.

So when Ruth Bolton and the Marketing Science Institute came calling and asked me to present to their Annual Trustee’s meeting in San Francisco, this topic of “People-Centered Marketing” came to mind immediately as something I definitely wanted to introduce to their high-level group of academics and practitioners, in order to get their feedback and have them help me develop it.

The presentation was great, and the comments I received were extremely helpful. I thought I would share the introduction to the presentation with you, my beloved blog audience, in order to give you a flavor of this work and share some of what is to come.

consumer_knowledge.jpgFollowing is the introduction to the presentation, where I lay out the idea of People-Centered Marketing in basic form, and give the essential outline of the talk.

As an anthropologist, I am drawn to the history of marketing-which likes in face-to-face, interpersonal exchange. It’s an aspect that lives on in service encounters and in marketing throughout much of the developing world, accounting for perhaps eighty percent of all exchanges.

Modern marketing, marketing as we know it, has moved away from face-to-face encounters, of course. That has happened for very good reasons of scale. But in this move away from the face of the consumer, something has been lost. Something vitally important. Marketing as a field has become increasing distanced form the consumer and her world.

The consumer has become less and less of a person, and more and more of an abstraction. An object, if you will.

In this presentation, I will propose that marketing as a field is in a state of slow decline. I will speculate that an important reason for this deterioration is because we have been following almost exclusively one somewhat limited model of understanding the consumer. This is a model which abstract, distances, and objectifies not only the consumer, but the marketer and the very act of marketing.

Acting as a bit of an agent provacateur, I will provoke more questions rather than propose answers to this dilemma.

Overall, I will suggest that we need to rethink how we think about consumer understanding. How will we seek to know our consumers? In our difficult and dynamic environment, that intensely philosophical examination is actually an extremely urgent question with immensely practical ramifications for how we do marketing and how we do business.

So, using and proposing the term “People-Centered Marketing” for the very first time, here, I will propose a more relational, conversational, lifeworld-centered style of both understanding and interacting with consumers as we go forward in these changing, challenging times.

dehumanized_2.jpgHere is how I will frame this view:

  1. I will begin with a high-level look at the field of marketing as it currently stands
  2. Then, drawing on my own experiences as the founder of a new marketing research approach, I will reflect on why I think marketing must deal with these issues
  3. Then, the presentation takes a turn into philosophical terrains—into phenomenology and the “conservative wing of Heideggerian hermeneutics” to be exact—in order to unpack the meaning of understanding in relation to “understanding the consumer”
  4. From there, I explain three ways of understanding consumers which show how we need to refucos and balance what we do as marketers and marketing researchers
  5. Finally, I offer a few examples and some very cursory ideas about first steps towards strategically implementing these changes in the practice of day-to-day marketing and management.

 And, yes, I did it all in a 35 minute presentation! I can’t quite believe that myself.

And if you want more, as *they* say, “Ya gotta buy the book.” Except it isn’t written yet… Comments from you, Gentle Readers, are always welcome. Thanks for listening, and for “understanding”….(see how subtle my patented fractal-segue-conclusions can be?….).

 

 

 

3 thoughts on “People-Centered Marketing: An Introduction

  1. rasputin7

    Good stuff, Rob! Always thoughtful and engaging. Yes, it seems like that “trickster” technology hath given and taken (like the big print/small print dichotomy that Tom Waits has remarked upon…)

    These high-tech tools certainly enable us to do a lot more, and faster. But at a cost. If we’re not careful, as you suggest, we also can be “disappeared” by the technology that, in some (important) ways, does indeed connect us and provide valuable insights.

    Disembodied marketing: ghosts creating more ghosts.

    Thanks for sharing your fine ideas here.

    -Matt
    http://hauntededwardian.wordpress.com/

  2. rrneal

    I resonant with your thought flow! The explosion of consumer interaction worldwide via digital technology has collided headlong into marketing principles developed in the 1950s that simply haven’t evolved to keep up. As a result, business is experiencing a classic knowledge gap in reference to marketing intelligence. A gap most likely defined as “one cannot properly articulate a question to ask when one is innocently unaware of an answer being required.”

    To your point – a construct is needed to properly establish the language (and crucial pragmatics) for the maturation of marketing to take place for adequately grappling with the online consumer conversation.

    This reminds me of a story about Christopher Columbus and the indigenous tribe of the Bahamas… the Taino. The story described several Taino warriors hunting along the beach while Christopher’s largest ship, the Gallega, was breaking the horizon en route to their small island. No one noticed the three tall ships coming closer and closer until a Taino Priest saw the main sails from his hut. The Priest had never seen anything like a European Galley as he excitedly attempted to steer the gaze of the tribe’s warriors towards this discovery. No one else could see what the Priest was seeing. There was suspicion around the possibility of the Priest suffering from a psychotic break. The Priest became extremely frantic, growing into a rage, during his attempts at getting the tribe to see this exciting, scary “floating thing” coming towards their island. The entire tribe gazed into the ocean. No one else could see anything in the open water.

    In the end, it was said the people of the Taino had no concept for “tall sailing ship”. That it literally took Christopher’s ships to lay anchor just offshore before people could “see” these new visitors. And still several more days before they could develop a shared construct for understanding these Europeans to be something other than light-skinned apparitions.

    In summation, those of us interested and engaged in this new cohort of marketing are still considered “apparitions” by the world around us.

    Cheers,
    RRNeal

  3. polysemy

    Hi, Rob! Remember the “stalker” who just “talks” to you at the ACR conferences? Anyway, I think we (at least you, rasputin7, and I) are going into the right direction as you proposed such a well-pronounced idea, and I agreed to it.

    We never understood consumers correctly but just pretended. Okay, then it’s not understanding or anything as many (or at least some) will agree. A few questions:

    Do you think we need new vocabulary for what we have believed to be “understanding?”
    Is understanding the consumer the only key to reinstate the current state of marketing? Marketing has been existing for long without understanding them…What if we can’t (you know they become more and more whimsical and agentic)?
    Haven’t we tried those two (phenomenology and hermeneutics)?

    Sorry, too much mumbo-jumbo….Perhaps we are talking about parallax approximation….

    Looking forward to more good stuff from you.

You must log in to post a comment.