Category Archives: Oy Canada!

Target is Coming to Town

target2.jpgThe retail consumer in Canada is finally going to catch a break. After putting up with a dreary, outdated, ho-hum retail market for decades, in which retailing has consistently been about 20 years behind its US neighbors, there are changes afoot.

First came Costco. Great success.

Then Wal-Mart. Big success.

Then came the Apple store. Monster success.

Then Victoria’s Secret. Looking gooooood.

Now, Target. Minneapolis, MN-based Target Corp has just announced a deal to acquire the leasehold sites for up to 220 locations from Zeller’s Canada.  They plan to open 100 to 150 Target locations across Canada during 2013 and 2014, after investing about $1 billion in improvements and upgrades. And hiring a load of happy Canadians.

I have been using Target as an example of excellence in branding, target.jpgcustomer service, and retail delivery in my marketing classes for years. They have been outstanding competitors in a tough marketplace, and they have managed to maintain a lower-price higher-quality positioning that has proven nearly impossible for Wal-Mart to beat. As a consumer, I always felt that Target provided a far superior shopping experience to most other retailers, including Wal-Mart. Wal-Mart was about price, Target was about the experience.

I believe that Target has likely come to Canada for a few reasons:

  1. Slowing growth in the domestic US retail market
  2. Fierce competition in the domestic US retail market
  3. Saturation with Target stores in the US (they always stated they were going to saturate the US first before going international)
  4. Lots of cross-border shopping, which would have shown up on their radar
  5. The Canadian economy and consumer market’s resistance to recent economic dips
  6. Stronger than ever Canadian dollar (at par)
  7. Long-term prospects for strong Canadian dollar (petro bucks and the fact that all retail has an arbitrage element)
  8. Canadian dissatisfaction with retail service and choice levels
  9. Weak Canadian retail brands (Zellers? The Bay? Canadian Tire? come on….)target3.jpg
  10. Great brand recognition, awareness, and positive attitude among Canadian consumers towards Target already (who travel frequently to the US)
  11. Target’s convenient format: one-stop shopping for food, clothes (decent ones at that), sports equipment, electronics, toys, small appliances, bedding, kitchenware, linen, furniture, pharmacy and health care
  12. Target is clean. It’s customer service is outstanding.The format of the store, with wide spacious aisles and clear signage, is best in class. The experience–as I said before, and have written about already in some of my retail work–is what Target is all about.
  13. The French pronounciation may or may not have been a deciding element. Repeat after me…Tar GHAY est tres Canadian, eh?

My wife puts it this way: “I feel happy when I shop there.” We have missed the Target retail experience ever since moving to Toronto from Madison. I think that the Canadian consumer is going to richly reward Target for this decision, and the warm and wonderful feelings are going to be mutual. I know in my house we can hardly wait. The slow countdown to 2013 begins. When will they open already? And, oh…

When is The Cheesecake Factory opening in Yorkdale for goodness sake?

York Strike Karma

York Strike Karma Cloud

Well, sometimes it’s just hard to keep silent.

As many of you probably know, I’m a faculty member in Toronto at the business school of Canada’s third largest university, York University. As many of you probably don’t, given the international constitution of my blog audience (only a tiny, tiny minority of my readers are actually coming from Canada), York University is currently on strike — at least it is for undergraduates, about 50,000 undergraduates being affected.

There are 3340 striking teaching assistants, contract faculties and graduate assistants currently at York University. I’ve been following the strike on and off, as it started 10 weeks ago while I was away on my sabbatical travel. I’m still on sabbatical and the strike doesn’t affect me personally at all.

Scratch that. It affects me a lot.

First of all, when I go in to my office, I totally feel for the people on the picket lines. It’s obvious, even before the -20° weather set in Toronto, that they didn’t want to be there. Who would? They clearly are fighting for what they think is right. But these are tough economic times. And there are some difficult realities that all of us are having to face right now. In other words, it’s a really, really, really bad time to be striking.

My heart really goes out to the students. Our undergraduate program at Schulich has ground to a standstill. Fifty thousand students are sitting there waiting to be taught. Started classes, books are bought, tuition is paid. International students are twiddling their thumbs. If any of them want a part-time job, good luck getting it. You’re competing with the other 50,000 students, and what employer in this economic climate or any other one, is going to want to hire you knowing that within a week or two you could be called back your classes, and that will become your first priority. It’s an impossible, untenable, disgusting situation to be putting students into. It turns my stomach.

Furthermore, as an academic I can’t imagine why I would want to be unionized (I am though–no one gave me a choice). I just don’t see the point in it. I’m not a coal miner. I don’t work on some unsafe production line. I work in a business school, teaching business students. If I do my job right, and I teach my students well, and I inspire businesspeople, and I publish in the world’s top journals, and I play a part in my academic community, then why the heck would I need a union? I worked for seven years in a private American university as a junior faculty member. I sweated it out. There was no safety net. No union. And I did okay.

Let’s talk about online communities for a second. There is even a Facebook group for the parents of York students who are sick and tired of this strike. Recently, parents warned each other to think really carefully before they send their kids to York University. One parent was quoted in Toronto’s major newspaper telling other parents of that Facebook group that “the history of labor disputes really affects the learning.”

Well, duh! It sure does.

Karma is already coming to bite us back in the behind. The news story today on the front page of Toronto’s major newspaper, the Toronto Star, reports a dramatic drop in the number of students who are picking York University as their first choice for University next year.

Overall applications by high school students to universities across Ontario is actually up 1.1% over last year. But not to York.

Applications to York are down almost 15%. Not a surprise for me. I expected to drop to be even higher. I can understand why parents and students would feel threatened by this strike. It just wouldn’t make sense not to learn from the past.

So who benefits? Well, York University’s competitors in Toronto certainly did. Applications to University of Toronto are up over 4%. Applications to Ryerson University are up over 10%. And applications to the Ontario College of Art and Design are up over 20%. All of these postsecondary schools are in Toronto. The strikers handed them a huge gift. And in a tough economy, those admissions of those applications are harder to find. That money is money taken away from University, resources lost.

Where is the extra money to pay these striking workers demands going to come from? And the striking workers, who have been disrupting classes, marching in during examinations and singing songs, holding back students from Canada and around the world in their studies, messing up their summer work plans and their chances of getting hired for internships and summer positions… are they supposed to simply and seamlessly rejoin the community?

Even if the striking workers go back to work this year, the damage is done. People aren’t going to soon forget the strike of 2008 to 2009 and what it did to York University, York University students, and the future of the university.

It’s shameful.

Tearing Down the Wall: The Costco Screw Circus Elephant Story

I’m back. Traveling, presenting, and teaching were all-consuming for a while, but I am definitely back in action. Back for you with a three-metaphor tales of brands and frustration. All involving a wall, a chair, a set of screws, a retailer and their customer service system, and a circus elephant. Now how can you resist that?

So….In the last song on their magnificent theme rock album, The Wall, Pink Floyd poetically contemplate a life without the emotional blockades that people put up around them:

“All alone, or in twos
The ones who really love you
Walk up and down outside the wall
Some hand in hand
Some gathering together in bands
The bleeding hearts and the artists
Make their stand
And when they’ve given you their all
Some stagger and fall
After all
It’s not easy
banging your heart
against some mad buggers
Wall”

In a prior posting, I used the metaphor of the mute slave Nova to talk about the recent changes that had occurred as a result of information technology suddenly giving a voice to the previously voiceless.

In a recent presentation on online communities that I gave to a terrific industry group, the Canadian Housewares and Hardware Manufacturing Association, I extemporaneously thought up another metaphor I thought I’d share with you.

The Wall!I said that for a long time most corporations operated as if there was a wall separating it from its consumers. Businesses tossed products over the wall, and consumers tossed over their money. And everything seemed to work okay.

When businesses wanted to find out about consumers, they’d invite a few of them to come to their side of the wall, put them behind one-way glass (yes, another wall) and study them. Then they’d send them back where they belonged, to their side of the wall. Everyone was happy. Or so it seemed.

But then came the Internet. The two-way channel. And the wall began to crumble. Consumers started to see what was inside businesses. To see where products were sourced. To detect sweatshops and biased hiring practices. To question ethical policies. Then, to reach out to businesses. To try to influence them. To find executive emails and write to them. To comment on corporate blogs. And companies found, through techniques like netnography, that there were conversations going on around them and their brands and products that they could gain easy access to. They could actually hear the voice of the consumer 24/7. There was no wall. The wall had crumbled.

And yet, when you look at business today, managers are still acting as if there was a wall. It’s pretty much business as usual.

We are creatures of habit. For our third metaphor of this story, let me burden you with another metaphor and ask have you heard about how circus elephants are trained? When a baby elephant is trained, they are tethered to a strong steel stake in the ground. The elephant struggles to get away but the pole is much stronger than the elephant is. The elephant soon learns that its movement is limited by the length of it rope. As the elephant grows, the stake can be replaced by just a simple wooden stake. The elephant has learned its limitation, even though if it tried as an adult it could easily pull up the stake and run free.

Elephants in bondageSimilarly, managers act as though this wall was still up and protecting them from view, separating them from their consumers, and ignore the idea that they are actually living in a world that is much more transparent.

As an example, I’d like to tell you about a recent experience I had with Costco.

First let me be clear that I really like Costco. I’m a faithful and devoted Costco customer, and maybe that’s why this is a good example. I joined up when I lived in Chicago and had almost universally good experiences with the Costco I shopped at in Chicago, right next to my favorite retailer of all, Target. But when I got to Canada, I discovered that the vaunted Costco customer service didn’t really extend over the border.

That’s true of a lot of Canadian companies. The customer service standards in Canada are definitely lower than they are in America. Part of the problem, I think, is that Canadians don’t seem to think that it is “polite” to complain, or to demand better service. The average Canadian seems quite content to live out this scenario: stand in a line for an hour to get to a complaint department clerk, get to to the front and get scolded and told they can’t help them, apologize to the clerk because to make a fuss would be very un-Canadian, and then walk away with nothing. That sort of thing rarely happens in America. In fact, my momma taught me good. She said “The squeaky wheel gets the grease, boy.” And I learned to squeak.

So here’s my squeak for today.

I recently ordered some office chairs from Costco.ca online. They were decent chairs at a decent price. When I received the chairs, one of the boxes was broken and the screws and bolts needed for assembling it had spilled out. So I filled out a form on to the company’s incredibly unfriendly web site. The ensuing struggle to try and get decent customer service this company illustrates my point about how impersonal, bureaucratic, and ineffective contemporary company’s can be.

Because this is a new, transparent world, I am going to share these exchanges with you, in the hopes that managers and intelligent, aspiring business-people of all kinds can learn something from it. Because I’m conscious of the dignity of the individuals involved, I’ve changed the name of the person I had these exchanges with. My issue is with the company and its system, not with this individual person.

Here is the initial message that I sent on March 9th through the form-based complaint system that they channeled me into:

“I just ordered three chair from costco,ca, which were delivered to my home last week.
The details are:
Order Number: 71053703
Membership Number : XXXXXX0000
Date Placed : 02/03/2008
The chairs were delivered, but one box was damaged.
The hardware for one of the chairs (screws) was missing. I can’t assemble the chair without this hardware. Can you please send me the missing hardware for this one chair ASAP:
Lucia Task Chair Item# 149643
Thank you.
Robert Kozinets”

Pretty polite and exhaustive, I thought. The very same day, I got a response. Here it is:

“Dear valued customer,
Thank you for e-mailing costco.ca. This is an automated message to confirm receipt of your e-mail. Our staff is available to respond to messages during regular business hours, excluding holidays. We will make every effort to send a personal response via e-mail from one of our Member Service Representatives as quickly as possible.
Please do not send multiple messages, as this will only delay our response time.”

Well, that last bit isn’t a very friendly way to talk to your “valued customer” is it? Okay, so I waited. I only needed a few screws, after all. So March 9 is a Sunday. So Monday March 10th comes and go. Tuesday March 11th. Wednesday March 12th. So far, that’s three days I’m waiting for them to answer my initial phone call. Thursday March 13th. Nothing. Okay. I’m busy anyways, but curious now. The open box with the chair pieces is sitting in my living room, waiting to be assembled. On Friday March 14th, they answer me:

“Dear Robert,
In response to your email, please be advised that we apologize for the delay in responding to you. Due to circumstances beyond our control, we have only just received your email.

Due to a vast increase in sales lately, our wait times for phone calls as well as replies to emails is quite a bit longer than we aim for them to be. We are working hard to correct this issue, and are working to implement measures to cut down on wait times. We appreciate your patience while we work through this busy time, and work to take care of our members.We were advised by our vendor that the screws are affixed to the chair. They advised to check under the arms of chairs. If you are unable to locate the screws, please reply to this email as we will contact the vendor to send replacements.

Please reply to this email if you have any other inquiries.

Thank you,
“Trudy”
Costco Wholesale Canada ltd.”

I note the “due to circumstances beyond our control, we have only just received your email” opener. All warm and friendly like. We’re late, we apologize, but it’s not our fault. It’s people’s fault for causing the “vast increase in sales.” Good to hear, Costco. But doesn’t that also mean a correspondingly “vast increase in money”? So maybe, Costco, you could afford to hire a few more people for your customer service group, and take the pressure off of some of them?

And maybe give them a bit more training in reading emails. I waited almost a week for Trudy to tell me that the screws should have been in the box. She replied to me, essentially, as if I didn’t even know where to look for the screws before asking her to replace them. Perhaps it is Costco policy to treat customers like imbeciles, hoping they will go away, rather than to directly service their complaints. Probably it’s a hassle to service complaints right aay, so you pass the hassle back, one more time to the customer. But really, all this did was insult me. That’s feedback for companies. It may save you a few bucks, but it annoys people. Don’t do that.

So I write back. Making the situation very clear.

“Hi Trudy:

The box was broken and the screws fell out. The other two chairs had them where you said. The one chair had a broken bag with only a few screws. If you can get more hardware to me, then I can put this chair together.

Thank you for your help with this.
Robert Kozinets”

I think I said that already, And then I give her my home phone number to call me. That was March 14th. Then comes the weekend. March 15th and 16th. Monday March 17th comes and goes without any response. Then, on Tuesday March 18th, a message with a ray of hope.

“Dear Robert,

In response to your email, please be advised that we were advised that the replacement hardware will be shipped to your on Thursday of this week. Once we receive confirmation, we will provide tracking information to track the hardware.
Please reply to this email if you have any other inquiries.

Thank you,
Trudy
Costco Wholesale Canada ltd.”

And my immediate response, of course is:

“Thank you!”

Okay, it’s March 18th. Trudy says my screws are going out on Thursday, that’s March 20th. How long can they take?

the missing screwsWell, a pretty long time, it seems. I was expecting those screws on, say, Friday. Saturday. Maybe Monday March 24th latest. I courier to Europe pretty often, to Australia. I can get my package to Australia in three days. I was thinking getting a few screws from a plant outside of Toronto (or even outside of San Francisco) shouldn’t take longer than that.

I was wrong. On Tuesday, March 25th, I wrote to her again in a message entitled “No Customer Service.”

“Dear Trudy:

“I have still not received the hardware for my chair. My original complaint went out on March 9th (16 days ago), and I am extremely dissatisfied with Costco’s customer service on this matter.

Please send this letter to your supervisor. I am a long-time member of Costco, having joined over a decade ago. I would like immediate action on this matter and am very frustrated with this.

Robert Kozinets”

Costco has made me wait, told me it’s not their fault, treated me like an idiot, promised me the stupid little screws on a certain date, and not delivered. I can’t put the chair together without the screws. So I’m pulling rank: hey, I’m a long-time “member,” I’m higher in the food chain than other members, I’ve been supporting you for over a decade. Please. And let’s move up to Costco hierarchy. Let me talk to someone in charge, Trudy.

What’s the response?

“Thank you for contacting costco.ca,
Please note your e-mail has not been submitted to customer service as we have upgraded our e-mail system. Simply click here and follow 3 easy steps to submit your question. Our goal is to provide immediate assistance and continue to add features to improve the customer service experience. If the above link does not work, paste the following link into your browser:

https://www.costco.ca/CustomerService/EmailUs.aspx?secure=1〈=en-CA

This is an automated response and any replies sent will not receive assistance.
Costco Wholesale”

There’s that obstructive email and information system again. So much for the benefits of “membership.” So now their system has changed. And my message hasn’t been sent. I’ve got to follow orders again. Is this starting to sound familiar to you? Anyone had experiences like this one lately?

There is a wall, right? And we consumers, the little people, are on the other side of the wall. Our job is to throw money over the wall and they throw products and then we both walk away.

But the fact that you’re seeing this means that there actually is no wall. The wall is down.

But I still need my damn chair screws. And the Costco circus elephants (that means the folks who set up the system, not really Trudy) aren’t letting me have them! So on March 25th, right away, I resend the message. The weekend happens. March 28th, 29th, 30th. Now it’s April Fool’s day, a perfect time to say this was all a prank, a good joke. Some cool material for your awesome blog. Nope, nothing.

Sounds of crickets chirping.

I asked Trudy to bump this up to her supervisor, long ago. I’m trying to remember a time when I didn’t have disassembled chair in my house. On April 2nd, I hear from her.

“Dear Robert,
In response to your email, please be advised that we were advised that these replacement screws are currently being shipped to you. We were advised of an invalid tracking number. Once we receive a response with our vendor, we will advise of the correct information.
Please reply to this email if you have any other inquiries.
Thank you,
Trudy
Costco Wholesale Canada ltd.
* Visit www.costco.ca to receive our exclusive offers by email.”

I actually wanted to talk to a supervisor. I wanted to discuss returning the chair. Instead, they share their problems with me. An “invalid tracking number.” I don’t care. And no thanks, after this I really don’t feel like receiving your exclusive offers by email.

I had a professor, the late and great Professor Jerry Dermer, who taught me during my MBA here in Toronto at York. Whenever we offered an excuse, he used to call us on it. He’d say to my group “That’s your problem, don’t make it my problem.” And he was completely right.


Costco, the invalid tracking number is your problem. The vendor, the email system, the other consumers waiting in a great big line with complaints about your products. They’re all your problem. Why are you making them my problem?
I just want my chair intact. Correct your mistake. Call whoever you need to call and get them moving today. Take charge. On April 2nd she wrote back.

“Dear Robert,
In response to your email, please be advised that as previously mentioned, we have sent a request for your replacement hardware to be shipped to you. Please note that I was away for one week and was unable to receive response from our vendor at that time. We have escalated this issue with management and your replacement hardware was shipped on March 28th as mentioned in my previous email. Please advise if you have not yet received your hardware.
Please reply to this email if you have any other inquiries.
Thank you,
Trudy
Costco Wholesale Canada ltd.”

Is poor Trudy the only person who works there? I’m starting to feel sorry for her. If she’s away and all of Costco.com Canada’s service stops, then that’s a real bad thing. Sales increase and she gets overwhelmed. I’m beginning to get a picture of her routine, that’s for sure. And having worked in retail for over a decade when I was younger, I can certainly empathize with the hassles she faces in her line of work. It’s something that Arlie Hochschild has written about in her work on emotional labor, particularly The Managed Heart. People in retail and other service positions often have to cloak and “manage” their own emotions as part of their work, and this can be very difficult for them.

Trudy’s issues sure don’t sound like very good workforce planning to me. And those workforce planning issues are having a direct effect on me and my living room, which still has chair parts scattered around. And March 28th, that was 5 week days ago. I could have my package to Australia, and back.

How did they send it, horseback from Poughkeepsie? Turtle Express?

My reply, short & sweet, the next day, on April 3rd.

“Trudy:
I never received it. This has now gone on for a month. I want your supervisor’s phone number.”

Her response comes the same day.

“Dear Robert,
As previously mentioned, this issue is currently being taken up with management. I have enclosed waybill information in regards to this as sent from our vendor. Please note that the vendor has sent out additional hardware for you in case if this hardware had been lost in transit. We do sincerely apologize for the delay in assembling your chair.
Please reply to this email if you have any other inquiries.
Thank you,
Trudy

Costco Wholesale Canada ltd.”

My once-beloved Costco (artist's impression) I really, truly wanted a human being to talk to me on the phone. I wasn’t going to shout or otherwise go all ugly American on her or anything like that. I thought that, after a month in Costco Screw Limbo I was entitled to a five-minute call letting them know how disappointed I was in Costco. My Cherished Costco. The Coscto I adored, spent lots of money at, had an Executive Card and an Amex Rebate Card from, and word-of-mouthed to so many people to about.

Just let me talk for three minutes to a real live person who will know that I’m a human being with better things to do than play this annoying, time-consuming waiting and responding game with for a handful of 25 cent screws.

I also would have told them that this is not about them personally, but about the system that they are made to work within. I would have listened to them so I understood more about why this is happening. At that time, I had no idea I’d be blogging about it. No intention to at all. I just wanted to talk to someone to have that sense of contact and maybe get something done about this already.

So I wrote:

“Why won’t you give me your supervisor’s phone number, Trudy? I’d like to talk to him or her about this matter. Nothing has happened, and it has been one month. Oh, and if you give me your surname, that would help too….”

It comes off as a little rude, I regret to say, and I was pretty angry at the time. It seemed like I was being stonewalled.

On the next day, April 4th, she wrote back.

“Dear Robert,
Please be advised that a supervisor would be telling you the same information. I will pass this information on and will advise a supervisor to contact you. Please note that for privacy reasons we are unable to provide personal information. Please advise of a contact number that we may contact you at.
Please reply to this email if you have any other inquiries.
Thank you,
Trudythe missing screws again....for emphasis

Costco Wholesale Canada ltd.”

They have my phone number. No one called (until after this blog was posted…see my follow-up postings). I got the screws in the mail a couple of days ago, wrapped up newsprint in a printer toner cartridge box with no identifying information on it. I had no idea what they were. The Coscto label and name were nowhere on the box. No information was inside.

The whole mailer thing seemed very unprofessional from a branding and customer service management perspective. So, for example, when I order from eBay, I always have had a much better package and much better communication that this. That’s from people operating, for the most part, from their homes, on very low margins and with very few resources. But those people at eBay really recognize the value of a happy customer, and the power of effective communications. Costco really disappointed me with this one.

My chair is assembled, now, but the bad taste in my mouth for Costco lingers on. And I do feel bad for Trudy and the situation she’s face with everyday.

The wall is coming down. You’ve seen the messages. The wall is tumbling like Jericho at our feet. I know that. You know that. But do most companies? Do they realize that there is no wall when they hire sweatshop labor? When they deal with dictatorial oppressive regimes? When they devastate environments and communities? When they trade unfairly? When they press their personnel?

And once they know that there’s a new transparency to everything they do, do they know what to do? Elephants with the stakes pulled out. They’re standing around, flat-footed, unable to move, incapable of acting.

This isn’t about my silly screws. Or Costco. This is about the way companies are held accountable. It doesn’t matter if it is broken boxes and screws or human rights and poisoned water supplies we are talking about, companies need to be more responsive to the concerns of their publics and their consumers or they are going to be called out publicly, communally, collectively, repeatedly.

That’s the new reality. It is tough. It is going to require a lot of adjustments. It’s going to make values and priorities a lot clearer for all of us in the long run. And I think that’s a very good thing.

The Intergalactic Price of Being Canadian

galaxy_istock.jpg

I can’t believe it. Canada’s national newspaper, the Globe and Mail, the Canuck equivalent of USA Today just called the entire Canadian population, and I quote the headline, “suckers.” (Thanks to my pal Don Hicks for passing along the article link).

Amazing. Here’s the link to the story by a very brave and insightful writer, Neil Reynolds. He is picking up one of the themes of my recent blog about the problems with living in Toronto, and by extension living in Canada. One of them was why we have currency parity with America, but everything here is higher priced. A quick for instance is Jackie Huba’s 2007 book Citizen Marketers: US price is $25. Canadian price is $31. Why?

Similarly, Mr. Reynolds is talking about is the high cost of American goods in Canada, which is completely out of line with the cost of getting those goods here. The Canadian public has been royally ripped off by a bad system for years.

He quotes several strudies of the phenomenon of the so-called “border factor.” These economists

“looked at the prices of identical goods on each side of the border and accounted for all the possible costs, leaving the mysterious “border factor” as the only variable. On the U.S. side, this was the equivalent of the cost of shipping the goods an additional 47 kilometres. On the Canadian side, they found product prices were higher by the cost equivalent of shipping goods an additional 108 million kilometres – or 141 round trips to the moon. Unbelievable, indeed. What’s happening here? In what way can the U.S.-Canada border, all by itself, defy fundamental laws of economics? In its own analysis of this mystery, the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco decided that consumer prices are often set by factors that have little to do with actual cost – factors that operate independently of exchange rates.”

So what are these mysterious factors that defy economic rules and confound economists? Why it’s that usual suspect: Mr. Culture, of course!

“What explains the extraordinary divergence in retail prices between the U.S. and Canada? Put it down, in the end, to a deeply entrenched Canadian willingness to pay more for many goods than they are worth. Put it down to consumer laziness. Especially now, Canadians can pay much less by crossing the border or by ordering direct from the U.S. Most Canadians, though, won’t. Merchants will continue to price to the market – to charge what people will pay. This is why we will keep paying intergalactic prices – whether we have parity or beyond.”

Intergalactic prices: 141 round trips to the moon’s worth of price jacking. Mr. Reynolds starts scratching away at the surface of the deep dark Canadian secret in his article, but I can pick up my trusty shovel and keep right on excavating.

I wrote a few days ago that “the Canadian dollar broke through and made it to parity with the US dollar for the first time in 30 years. But have we seen the significant savings of the Canadian dollars’ climb?” No way. In fact, the savings have not been passed on to consumers. They’ve been kept by Canadian businesses.

I asked, Why? And then answered by own question. Because of complacency. Consumers are complacent. Content with what they have. Happy to pay exorbitantly more for their flat screen TVs and salty snacks than their neighbors in Buffalo New York. And come on, Mr. Reynolds, we can’t expect people to drive to the USA to do their shopping. For big purchases like that HD plasma screen TV, the government forbids it. And practicality demands it. And when you order from the USA by mail, guess what happens? The government tacks on big customs and duty bills that make the savings moot. I learned that as soon as I moved here.

The Canadian government favors business interests over consumers. And that’s a cultural issues as well as a political one. You would have thought that the “socialist” Canadian government would have regulations to protect consumers from price-gouging, but apparently they don’t or they won’t enforce them. I can tell you that buying a home here was like the Wild West. No disclosures, no enforcement mechanism. Nothing. Buying a house in Illinois was far, far, far more regulated and tightly enforced. And the consumer benefited (and by extension, we’re all consumers).

Canadian Businesses are happy to overcharge, and keep on over-charing. And why shouldn’t they? It’s a caveat emptor, take-it-or-leave it nation. They aren’t competitive in the way US companies are. They don’t drive down prices. There are probably too many smaller local players, and they are just too familiar, and all-too comfortable to really compete. There are no Canadian-spun Sam Waltons and Richard Bransons who enter fat industries and cut prices to the average consumers’ benefit. Why would they? The government does nothing. The people let them. So why wouldn’t Canadians pay intergalactic prices?

Are any Canadian politicians interested in this issue? Any business people? Any consumers?

Wake up. Wake up! Suckers!