Monthly Archives: March 2010

New Netnography White Paper Available

netnography_whitepaper_cover.jpgNetBase asked me to write a white paper to explain netnography to business people and marketers. It is titled: Netnography: The Marketer’s Secret Weapon – How Social Media Understanding Drives Innovation.

I will be presenting the white paper tomorrow in New York at the Advertising Research Foundations’ re:think conference, at 11am.

NetBase just posted the White Paper download link online on their web-site, and here is the link:

http://www.netbase.com/landing_pages/netnography_paper/

Looks like you will need to fill out a form and get into their database as the price of admission.

I enjoyed and learned a lot writing a paper that is directed to a purely managerial audience. I hope you enjoy it.

Speaking and Giving Away Books at the ARF re:think conference

I try not to do much self-promotion on this blog, because I find that overly self-promotional blogs are not only boring in the extreme, but narcissistic. So forgive me if I mention a speaking gig that is coming up next week. I will really try not to lay this on too thick.

NetBase, an exciting company out of Palo Alto’s Silicon Valley, has sponsored me to come to the Advertising Research Foundation’s annual conference this year and speak about netnography. If any of you are available for it, the session is going to be held on Tuesday, March 23rd at 11am. I include their poster publicizing the event.

arf_session1.jpgThey have also been extremely generous in that they are giving away copies of my new book “Netnography: Doing Ethnographic Research Online” to attendees of the conference (see poster below and on the left for details). I will be on hand after the talk at the NetBase booth to personalize and sign the book and meet people.

So if you are coming to the ARF re:think conference in New York next week, PLEASE stop by, check out the talk, come meet me, and get your book. I’d really enjoy meeting you–so mention the blog.

As per FTC and other sensible guidelines, I’m writing this post of my own free will, and the opinions in it are not constructed, paid for, or endorsed by NetBase, although they did compensate me for writing the white paper and presenting it. So here’s something I think that marketing researchers, netnographers, and people/managers/researchers considering trying netnography might find interesting.

arf_booksigning_2.jpgNetBase has developed web crawling software that mines the content on the Internet and also classifies it using a sophisticated semantic recognition engine. That means it is able to recognize certain words and word orders, and then sort the online communications into categories.

So, for example, if someone posts something on a blog that says “The problem with Kozinets is that he is so damn modest,” the engine is able to recognize that the communication is about Kozinets, that it is talking about a problem, and that the problem is about “modest” or “modesty.”

The semantic search engine can also pick out another comment, on Twitter, say, such as “I really like the fact that Kozinets is so incredibly generous.” The engine would know that this is a positive comment, that it is about me, and that the positive thing that is like is “generous.”

It can get quite sophisticated in making grouping of these categories and providing a readout of likes and dislikes through all types of social media, such as blogs, forums, Twitter feed, and so on.

I started talking to Michael Osofsky, the founder of the company, about 3 years ago, and I was immediately intrigued by the potential of this software to be used as a netnographic search engine. Michael has been a great ambassador for his new company. He recognized the usefulness of his tool to netnography from the very beginning, and he has sought to build insights about the netnographic process into each successive version of the software. They even have a “Why Netnography” page on their web-site.

What I am also very enthusiastic about is the way that  NetBase’s product can speed up netnography by mining and classifying web-content, and then providing hyperlinks to original sources. So it actually mines conversations on the Net, comes up with relevant and pre-sorted verbata, and then, with a click, allows the user to look at the quotation in its original context. This is very handy when you are performing a netnography. Google and Technorati only can get you so far…something more sophisticated to take you farther.

Michael has been very generous about allowing me to use the NetBase system for netnographies, and I have found it very useful. In particular, recent iterations of the “ConsumerBase” system have helped me to conduct a few netnographies and have easily shaved days off my community identification and data collections research phases.

As I say in my book, computationally-assisted qualitative data analysis software is extremely helpful in conducting full-scale netnographies, and there are many good choices out there to use such as NVivo and Atlas.ti (although I am finding Atlas.ti’s business model a bit onerous and annoying lately). In the same vein, I think that semantic locations, sorting, and recognition software and systems such as NetBase’s ConsumerBase can be a very useful adjunct to all of the hard work involved in a netnography.

For a high-quality  netnography, I see this as a powerful adjunct, an assist, and a helper, but not a substitute for the for full-on participant observation. But, just like CAQDAS, a sophisticated semantic engine can definitely speed the research process up and make it more efficient.

NetBase asked me to write a white paper about netnography. Not a promotional piece for them, but a methodological explanation for managers. They are going to be posting it to their web-site very soon, and I’ll include a link here when it is available. I also got to perform a short, illustrative, computationally-assisted netnography of the Listerine brand and its consumer innovations. It was fun to research and write it, and it will be great to share a practical, applied netnography with all of you, rather than the academic kind I usually publish.

We are also hoping to conduct and record a webinar using the ARF Presentation material, and I will let all of you know when it is ready.

I hope to see you in New York at the ARF Conference if you are going. If not, there will be lots of takeaways available through NetBase‘s efforts to get the word out on netnography. Thanks to everyone at NetBase, especially to Michael and Lisa (who has been extremely patient and a wonderful, delightful person to work with). And I’m really looking to continuing to follow their software products and to explore how they can be used to help netnographers everywhere.

Avatar Thoughts: Dances with Avatars in the Mist

avatar_neytiri.jpgWith the Academy Awards just around the corner, and Avatar up for nine Oscars, I wanted to share some reflections on that motion picture.

I thought that the movie provided a feast of metaphorical food for thought. First, please consider this light spoiler alert. I’m not intentionally revealing secret plot elements, but if you want to see it with completely fresh eyes, you should probably save reading this blog until after you’ve seen the movie.

All right, then…

A lot of people have written about the fairly obvious, low-hanging and perhaps heavy-handed ecological messages in the film (“And so the aliens [that's us] went back to their dying world…”). The story from the film has created a ton of discussion and conflict on the Internet, with accusations that it is racist (the dump blue-skinned savages), it is naïve (um, this is Hollywood), and it is colonialist (see two points above).

My take on it is a little different. I’ve decided to really emphasize the ethnography part of the move. And to analyze a bit of the ethnographic alliance-shifting that is a central part of its plot.

The movie concerns a future military-industrial enterprise’s use of a biological remote-control system to undertake human participant-observation of the Pandora planet’s intelligent tribal inhabitants.

Along with all the other engaging metaphors that it weaves together, I find Avatar to also be an extended meditation not only on colonialism but also on the anthropological practice of ethnography in a capitalist military-industrial culture.

As my friend, Diego Rinallo from Milan’s Bocconi University noted to me after the movie was over “Avatar is all about ethnography.” And so it is.

Among the many other things that it is, Avatar is a science fictional concretization of the anthropologist’s journey. There is an alien–in this case, a literally alien– culture that needs examination. There is a scientific observer, the accidental anthropologist and paraplegic Jake Sully, who must learn the language, rituals, and ways of a new culture. In this case, instead of Polish anthropologist Bronislaw Malinowski joining the Trobriand Islanders, it is Sully joining the blue-skinned, animist, and very Native American-seeming Na’vi.

The movie is about identity, interests, loyalties, and change. A major concern is the classic anthropological dilemma of “Going Native.”

This was the same theme, sort of, as Dance with Wolves, and Gorillas in the Mist. There it is, happening again, on the big screen. Amazingly, Sigourney Weaver plays the head ethnographers in both Gorillas and Avatar. She’s our anthropological role model!

The ethnographer is, himself or herself, an avatar of types. This is a theme I explore in a recent poem I submitted to the Journal of Business Research as an extended meditation on introspection and ethnography, a poem that explores this avatar topic of possessing multiple identities and feeling identity conflict.

So this movie inspired some thinking in me about what we do as anthropologists-for-hire.

Why are we doing what we do as corporate ethnographers? Would we work for Exxon? Would we work for a company that wanted to mine the Amazon rain forest? Would we work for banks in poor countries where people might not be able to afford the interest rates?

The film reveals the dark side of the scientific-academic enterprise, and the dark secret that, although knowledge is power, academics sell out their power to the military-industrial system. In this case, science is anthropology, and anthropology offer understanding in order to manipulate and destroy. The Company in this film wanted to learning the cultural ways of the Na’Vi people in order to manipulate them. Does this sound like cultural marketing and applied anthropology to anyone else?

avatar-tank.jpgOf course, in the movie, understanding wasn’t geared towards selling the natives things. Apparently the blue Na’Vi had no need of Coca Cola and blue jeans, they were an anti-consumerist culture. The movie was classic colonialism—get them off of their land, and take it and its resources. Drain it dry. Kill the land and kill a way of life.

One big realization that I had was when Jake Sulley came back from his time with the Na’vi and, at some point, he had to realize his subversion, he had to adjust the flow of information to the flow of interests.

That is, once he had decided to help the Na’vi, the natives, he had to now tell them about the weaknesses or weak points of the human encampment (or, in the movie, to take the literal and powerfully figurative action of smashing the remote viewing lens on the tractor destroyer). This sort of double-agent stuff is classic ethnographic conflict. But I wonder about its wider implication for our daily life.

So, if we are consumer ethnographers working in the public interest, where are our alliances? Do we need to rethink them?

What it could mean is that we need to look at our power-relationships-to the machine world or to a more naturally balanced world– and then think about how we can use the knowledge of one to begin to dismantle the other. This is an activist message that says that only by some sort of rigorous motion that first draws from inside the system, but then punishes that system and opens it up, can there be change. It is a revolutionary, not an evolutionary message. Not what Heath and Potter, or many other environmental activists would see. And climate change seems to offer one justification for that sort of revolutionary movement in a revolutionary Moment.

What does Jake Sulley do? In the story, he finally casts off his human form, as much as he possibly can. That means no more Coca Cola, no more beer, no more blue jeans or even old reruns of movies like Avatar. He’s back in the bush.

What happens to anthropologist Dian Fossey in Gorillas in the Mist? She’s the sacrifice (and, there it is again, Sigourney is the sacrificial mother/boss in Avatar…weird).

What about Kevin Costner’s character, Dunbar, in Dancing with Wolves? He disappears into the wild at the end, presumably sacrificing himself for his Sioux friends. We assume that he is fully realized and integrated into the natural order. He now identifies more closely with “nature” than with the corrupt and destructive American society.

Because the move ends with this eye-opening move, it can not be satisfying. There are too many loose ends. This is a start, a beginning, rather than an ending.

So that’s where the movie offers up only a good tale and an uplifting inspirational message. However, that message is delivered in the most technologically-intensive manner possible. With all of its 3D IMAX computer simulation technology, the movies is of course much closer to being produced by the earth-razing techno-society of the Earth’s future than the arrows-and-fires civilization of the tribal Na’Vi.

I thought that, if this meditation on ethnography-as-industrial-power was a science fiction book, it would have held up extremely well. Its religiously-inspired plot of The Chosen One had much in common with Dune, Hyperion, and even with The Fifth Element and the Matrix, two other brilliant messianic SF movies.

As a parting note, it is also quite worth remarking upon that James Cameron hired USC Prof Paul Frommer to create an entirely new language for the film-something that had not been done since the Klingon language was devised by linguist Marc Okrand in 1984 for the third Star Trek movie.

These two languages, then, are the most recent distinct languages deliberately created by members of our species, and they were crated for remarkably similar reasons. It remains to see if the Na’Vi language will gain a fan community-based life of its own the way that the Klingon language has. I could certainly see this happening if there are sequels, adaptations, conventions, gatherings, and other media fan community activity around the film-something I would personally enjoy see unfolding. As a matter of fact, it seems like this movie is indeed the first in a trilogy. (I had purchased an Empire magazine last year that featured a story about the upcoming blockbuster Avatar; in the story, Cameron was reported to say this was the first of a trilogy; apparently, like Lucas and Star Wars, it had been planned this way all along.)

In the same way that Klingon has become a type of intentional, if not ironic, “ethnicity” according to cultural studies scholar Peter Chvany, that people adopt to explore some of their primitive warrior characteristics, so too could Na’Vi be a way to seek to reclaim some of the productive elements of primitivism that seems vitally missing from our current contemporary culture.

Anyone want to be the first to start their own local Na’Vi fan club? I’ll join. Let’s get blue and wild and talk difficult made-up languages. C’mon. It’ll be fun.

It’s also evident of the continual rise of blue skinned people (often proudly bald) that began with the Blue Man group in Chicago and this year appears to be crescendo-ing with Doctor Manhattan (in the Watchmen movie) and the graceful blue-skinned Na’Vi.

Yep. If there’s no fan club set up by October, I know what I’ll be wearing for Halloween.